Note: Photo tips are answers to questions asked on our Facebook page. If you would like to submit a question, please click here to submit your question. We will then post them on our Facebook page and let our fans respond to the question. We will then transfer the question over to our blog so we can keep them in an organized way for others to see.
Question from Kelsey: “I have a question. Looking at getting the 24-70mm lens. Should I go for the Nikon or an off brand like sigma. Price difference is about 1000.”
Heather: I have the Nikon. These lenses don’t depreciate, so if you can manage the extra money, it is worth it. I hear the focusing is faster and more accurate. I have nothing to compare it to, but I love my Nikon 24-70. Invaluable.
Vera: I just bought the Tamron 28-70, 2.8 because of the good reviews on Amazon. I paid around 350€ and I can`t believe how good thgis lens is! Totally worth giving it a try and compare it.
A Vinyard Image: hmmm Im really interested in this too!! I have the kit 18-55, a 50-, and a sigma 70-200. Im very happy with my sigma, best lens I have in my opinion, but I do feel that my 18-55 f/5.6 needs an upgrade. Very interested to hear what other people think!
Vera: For some reason it`s more expensive on amazon.com but still 1000$ less than the Nikon Original:
Kathrin: There is always a reason why there is something cheaper…Invest in it,you will love this lens ! A bit heavy and I needed to practice a little with it before really got the sharp pics like nikon promises (at beginning wasn’t so happy with it- but it was me I had to learn to use it lol) but now I love it !!!I
Dannielle: I am in the same boat! Only with Canon. Considering the Tamron 28-75. 2.8 ($529) or Sigma 24-70 2.8 ($900) just can’t justify the Canon at $2200.
Ashley: Same boat here! Need this for my first wedding in February, so I have a little while to save and make a decision.
Vera: I also rented the Nikon for weddings three times and I really don`t think that the pictures from the Tamron are not making up to it. I even find the Tamron easier to handle, lighter and shorter. I can`t see a reason to spend 1000$ more on the original.
Matt: Personally, I’ve never been as happy with the off brand lenses. Results from the higher quality glass are much better IMO
Brian: Rent them both and see which one you like better
Angie: Your questions are so relevant to where I am at as a photographer! You are one of my favorite people I follow on Facebook! Thank you so much ♥
Mark: I have several lenses 10-24, 70-200 F/2.8 that are Tamron – I’m extremely happy with the quality – and – I paid half of the cost of the Nikon lenses.
Fran: I am here too. Wanting the Nikon version badly…unsure about the Tamron. Renting not an option for me…hubby would croak!
Tony: Nikon! I bought a 3rd party extreme wide angle for Nikon camera, and was not pleased! I have the Nikon 24-70, and has been good so far! There is also a new Tamron 24-70 with VR worth looking at.
Cheryl: I love my tamron 24-75 I bought
Bridget: All of these lenses are capable of making gorgeous images. That said, Nikon (our Canon) lenses are generally considered to give a slightly better image in terms of sharpness, color, and contrast. Exactly how much I couldn’t tell you as I haven’t compared them side by side. Software can do a lot for color and contrast also. Only you can decide if the small difference is worth the price difference to you!
Andrea: I’ve heard good things about Sigma however I’m a one brand girl
I like all my equipment exactly how they are made to be. I feel the Nikon is a great investment especially for such a lens.
There are many factors, will a Sigma fit a new body in the future because Nikon will always fit a Nikon back and forth
Then consider sharpness and speed of the lens
Also I believe Sigma is not sealed so Nikon will give more life
I have the 24-70 Nikon and I do not regret a penny of it! It’s beautiful and for a zoom is amazingly sharp.
My favorite lens at the moment 🙂
Jen: I have the Tamron and like it. I am really glad I have it – I couldn’t afford the Nikon and couldn’t possibly justify the cost difference at this point.
Colleen: gosh….tough one….LOVE my Nikon…..it’s my fav lens….but, I have no comparison…so sorry!! I tend to buy brand…
Sheila: Is the Tamron version for DX or FX cameras? There are several DX lenses I like, but are useless on my D700
Janel: I have the 24-70mm f2.8 nano crystal & the clarity has doubled my business since purchasing it in July! I was told buy the good stuff bc you’ll end up spending the same amount on knockoffs & eventually end up buying the expensive one!
Ramona: I was in the same boat as you. I rented the Tamron 28-75 for a wedding and loved it soooooo I bit the bullet and purchased it from Adorama. LOVE IT! I am so surprised at how much I really do love this lens! Maybe I just got a “good copy” but for the price I am over the moon! I couldn’t afford the Canon one and I am so happy I had an alternative to choose from! 🙂
Sonya: After owning both Canon and Now Nikon if your going with Canon I would suggest using their lenses( they have major issues with aftermarket lenses working 100% with their digic processors etc and you will find them back focusing more often than not, I had a tamron til I got the canon 24-70) now I use Nikon and love their lenses but have sigma on it also and no problems, if your gonna invest in lenses invest well
Kat: following – great advice!! I’m in the same situation….
Alyssa: I haven’t used this lens with Sigma, but I’ve heard horror stories about focusing issues with this Sigma and the 50mm as well. I shoot with a 70-200mm Sigma which is an outstanding lens, but I’m not sure I’d trust them with much else!
Feel free to keep responding to this question using our comment section below.